Posts tagged EMI

Can Katy Perry stop EMI going to America for a song?

Billions of pounds of debt, the internet and piracy are crippling one of Britain’s most iconic firms

It is a tale of sex, debt and rock’n'roll that is unlikely to have a happy ending. When Guy Hands, a City financier with a penchant for fast food and an insatiable appetite for deal-making, came up with a plan to buy EMI, Britain’s flagship music company, using billions of pounds of borrowed money, many wondered how he could possibly make a decent return on his investment. As it has turned out, he couldn’t.

This weekend EMI’s new chairman Charles Allen, the former ITV chief executive hired by Hands last week to run the music arm of the company, is battling to ensure its independence, assembling a rescue plan for the company that signed the Beatles and became synonymous with the golden age of British pop.

Sources close to the company say Allen, a former accountant whose eclectic musical tastes encompass Lily Allen and Edith Piaf, is “rolling up his sleeves” and working to ensure the company does not breach the terms of its bank loans, but there is no doubt EMI is in peril. “It is a very, very big moment,” according to Claire Enders, founder of media consultancy Enders Analysis. “The next two or three months are critical for the future of EMI.”

Allen’s predecessor, Elio Leoni-Sceti, left suddenly last week just as the final touches were being put on a rescue package, prompting fears over the company’s future. The business is effectively being propped up by its past, surviving on the revenues generated by artists signed during a 30-year period when British music dominated the world.

The list of talent on EMI’s books reads like a roll call of rock royalty: David Bowie, Queen, Lennon and McCartney, the Sex Pistols and Pink Floyd. As an incubator of home-grown musical talent, the company is without equal and its position as one of the “big four” global record labels is a source of national pride; it exists to make money but EMI also safeguards the country’s status as a place where music that matters is made.

If EMI disappears or falls into foreign hands, many music industry figures worry that future generations of British acts may find it more difficult to find a worldwide audience. Jazz Summers, who manages former Verve vocalist Richard Ashcroft, who is signed to EMI, said: “If you look at their track record, they have broken more British acts in America than anyone else, and the same is true in other countries.”

EMI is in crisis because it is burdened with what sources close to the company describe as a “ludicrous” amount of debt, racked up after it was bought in 2007 by Hands’s private equity company Terra Firma. EMI Music currently has three artists in the top 15 of the album chart for the first time this century, including Blur vocalist Damon Albarn’s Gorillaz, and it is on course to make a profit of £200m this year, but a staggering three quarters of that will go on interest payments.

Hands borrowed heavily to fund the deal, using money provided by Terra Firma’s investors, and EMI’s valuable back catalogue, as collateral, but even then some questioned whether he was right to pay the amount he did for a business that was struggling to come to terms with downloads and a dramatic decline in physical music sales. The industry has lost between 30% and 50% of its revenues in the last five years, but the irony is that EMI is currently outperforming its peers, which include Sony BMG and Warner Music.

It had the biggest-selling album of 2008, Coldplay’s Viva La Vida, and reissued the Beatles digitally remastered back catalogue last year. Acts including Lily Allen and Katy Perry are selling well, but the way the company is structured means it cannot trade its way out of trouble.

Before the credit crunch, loans could be refinanced cheaply, but now EMI is struggling to meet its debt repayments in the wake of the severe economic downturn. It has been forced to cut costs dramatically, laying off close to 20% of its workforce. The company is now worth £450m, around a tenth of what Hands paid for it. Some big acts, including Radiohead, have already left, muttering that the money men simply didn’t understand the music business.

Last week one of EMI’s biggest-selling groups, Pink Floyd, won a court action preventing the company from making tracks from their 1970s album Dark Side of the Moon available to download individually. That was widely portrayed as a victory for artistic integrity – the group want their masterpiece to be consumed from start to finish, as they originally intended – but it also illustrates the challenges the music industry faces in an era of huge upheaval, when illegal downloading is costing it dear and making money from talent discovered and developed at huge cost is more difficult than ever.

If Allen cannot persuade Terra Firma’s investors to stump up another £120m, EMI will be in breach of its loan terms, and its main creditor – US bank Citigroup – could seize control of the company. If it does so, Citigroup is likely to sell it to Warner Music, an American rival which was outbid by Hands for EMI three years ago. The situation is complicated by Terra Firma’s decision to sue Citigroup in New York, accusing it of forcing EMI towards administration so it can take possession of the company and make a profit from a quick sale, allegations that the bank denies.

Hands is a larger-than-life tax exile, a hero in the Square Mile whose reputation has been badly tarnished by the EMI debacle. He now concedes he overpaid for EMI, but his miscalculation means he could be about to hand a much-loved cultural institution into the keeping of the Americans.

At the end of last year Cadbury’s city shareholders agreed to sell the nation’s favourite chocolate company to Illinois-based Kraft. The prospect of another household name passing into foreign ownership, particularly a national champion in one of the few industries in which Britain still excels, is an unsettling one.

One senior music industry executive explained: “For British music, the fact that there was a very successful British company to sign for was hugely significant.” However, others say the temptation to indulge in flag-waving should be resisted. Enders said: “Britain is one of the places people come looking for talent and that won’t change. There are a lot of players in the market and advances paid to acts such as Florence and The Machine have gone up.”

If EMI does fall into the hands of an American rival, she added, it might ultimately safeguard its future. “It would be better for EMI to have less indebtedness. It will have much more firepower.”

EMI could survive. It is still lining up the sale of some prized assets. It was reported last month that the Abbey Road studios in London could be sold off. The company later insisted the studios should stay under its ownership and was working with “third parties” about funding a “revitalisation project”.

Raising the possibility that a part of the nation’s cultural heritage could be sold provides a graphic reminder of how the company’s huge debt is forcing it to make unpopular decisions.

It may not matter if British acts are no longer championed by a UK company as long as the country continues to produce talent and A&R men from overseas arrive here in search of the next Lily Allen or Amy Winehouse. “In the end the music business is the same as it ever was,” Enders said. “It’s about hits.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Pink Floyd’s legal victory over EMI is a triumph for artistic integrity

The prog-rock band’s court win against their record label is a vindication of the album as a creative format

They don’t often look cheery in photos – and at least two of them can barely stand to be in the same room – but Pink Floyd have a lot to celebrate. The prog-rock legends won a pivotal victory against record company EMI over the sale of their own music. Basically, EMI wanted to make their classic concept albums available to download as individual songs. The band, however, prefer their albums to be downloaded as they were made: in their entirety, as complete musical works. And the judge agreed with Floyd.

At first glance, their motivation seems a little pretentious, recalling a time when supergroups like Led Zeppelin only released albums because they were serious artists and above all that pop stuff, man. However, Floyd’s victory is more than just musical snobbery: it’s a triumph for artistic integrity.

Michelangelo wouldn’t have wanted his Sistine Chapel ceiling to be chiselled into bits and flogged to individual buyers, so why should the same fate happen to Floyd’s painstakingly crafted The Dark Side of the Moon? Floyd’s most famous album appeared in 1973, when “long-playing records” appeared on vinyl. Back then, unless acts released tracks as singles, the only way of hearing individual tracks alone was to fiddle with the needle or hold a microphone in front of the stereo – a popular pastime among 70s teens – and record Roger Waters and co, perhaps accompanied by the sound of the family dog barking at the postman. 

Downloading has changed everything. Now we can dip into albums, taking a little bit here and there. It’s a wonderful way of experiencing music, especially music you have never heard before, without having to fork out on an LP. However, the downside has been the slow death of the album as a creative form. 

In recent years, the art of releasing a collection of songs that flow perfectly and make sense as a complete statement has faced a double onslaught. The digital era meant bands were suddenly having to come up with more and often inferior tracks just to pad out the longer CD format. But downloading has had a greater impact. The likes of Radiohead still take great care to release crafted albums, but often bands don’t really record albums any more. They record collections of downloadable tracks.
 
The upside of this is that many albums tend to have less filler; gone are the days of “frontloaded” LPs where a couple of hit singles at the start are followed by a lot of mush. Now, every track has to be good enough to be potentially downloaded. However, where would this approach would have left some of the greatest albums ever made? Would David Bowie’s opus The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars had anything like the same impact if people were able to dip in and out, experiencing the Ziggy character’s rise but avoiding his ultimate fate as a Rock ‘N’ Roll suicide? Granted, many concept albums are ludicrous prog-rock conceits. But it’s equally unthinkable to imagine hearing a non-concept masterpiece like Joy Division’s Closer in bite-sized chunks, rather than experiencing the full, unfolding horror/triumph of the second side’s stunning four-song sequence. 

Joy Division (and, for years, New Order) refused to release album tracks as singles, treating albums and singles as separate entities, a stance recently adopted by MGMT. If you want to hear Pink Floyd tracks as standalones, download the songs they released as singles, like 1967’s psychedelic cross-dressing anthem Arnold Layne (also on compilations like Relics) or 1979’s teacher-baiting Another Brick in the Wall. Or download albums like Wish You Were Here and Meddle to hear as the creators intended. The marketing men might not approve, but it will be good for music and, more importantly, the fate of the album.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Media Talk podcast: The Murdochs in Abu Dhabi and BBC digital radio roulette

Another week, another Media Talk.

Matt Wells is joined by Stephen Brook and Steve Ackerman to discuss brand extensions and digital spin-offs as the BBC plans to offer a sweetener for culling 6 Music by repackaging its DAB radio offering. What is Tim Davie up to?

Also in the podcast, we bring you the latest on Alexander Lebedev’s purchase of the Independent. As Noel Edmonds might say, deal or no deal?

Plus, Charles Allen’s got himself a new job – EMI: you have been warned – and we have all the highlights from the inaugural Abu Dhabi Media Summit, where Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch have been letting rip about paywalls, copyright, and, er, handbags.

Have a listen and comment on the blog below, or find us iTunes, Facebook, and Twitter.

And, if you’re interested in coming to the recording of our live Politics Weekly podcast in Manchester; or attending next week’s Media Guardian Changing Media Summit; or entering the 2010 Guardian Student Media Awards (launching Monday 15 March, so hold tight), please click appropriately.


Pink Floyd score victory for the concept album in court battle over ringtones

EMI told not to sell single tracks as downloads in ruling which could mean further losses for music label

Pink Floyd, the British rock group behind platinum-selling albums The Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall, today secured a legal victory for the much-maligned genre of the concept album against the apparently inexorable march of the instant pop download.

In a high court ruling that led the band’s fans to proclaim a victory for their heroes’ artistic integrity over the forces of commercial exploitation, a judge ruled that EMI can no longer sell the songs from any Pink Floyd albums as single downloads or mobile phone ringtones.

After a case brought by the band’s surviving members, Roger Waters, David Gilmour and Nick Mason, the high court chancellor, Sir Andrew Morritt, said the label must adhere to a clause in its contract with the group intended to “preserve the artistic integrity of the albums” which prevented the unbundling of Pink Floyd’s records.

Pink Floyd became one of the biggest rock bands in history with their elaborate and experimental concept albums and highly theatrical live tours. EMI had argued that its deal with the band, reaffirmed in 1999 before the download market took off, related to physical CDs and DVDs but not to online distribution.

Pink Floyd alleged, and EMI agreed, that the label had allowed online downloads from the albums and allowed parts of tracks to be used as ringtones despite the clause which “expressly prohibits” EMI from selling songs out of context.

The judge granted the band the declaration they sought – that the contract means EMI is not entitled to exploit recordings by online distribution or by any other means other than the complete original album without Pink Floyd’s consent.

“This is great for a band who are the masters of the concept album,” said Matthew Johns, who runs Brain Damage, a dedicated Pink Floyd fan site. “Their music is unlike most other artists and listening to a whole album can be an immersive experience if you get into the concepts.”

Generations of young people have, like Johns, pulled the curtains and turned down the lights to listen to the whole 43 minutes of 1973’s Dark Side of the Moon, in which tracks merge seamlessly, exploring themes of conflict, greed and the passage of time. Each side is a single piece, beginning and ending with a fading heartbeat. It sold an estimated 45 million copies.

The verdict means the band’s music may now have to be taken down from the iTunes online music store which requires that album tracks are for sale individually.

It could mean a further loss of revenue for EMI, which releases recordings for Coldplay and Kylie Minogue but last year posted a £1.75bn loss. Its chief executive, Elio Leoni-Sceti, this week announced his resignation and former ITV boss Charles Allen will take control of its music business.

Yesterday’s verdict is thought to be the first time a band have successfully taken their record label to court over the way it has distributed their music online. It could lead to other cases, music industry analysts believe.

Robert Howe QC, representing Pink Floyd, argued that it would have been “a very odd result” if members of Pink Floyd were able to control exactly how their music was sold as a physical product but there was “a free-for-all with no limitation on online distribution”.Elizabeth Jones QC, appearing for EMI, disagreed and said the word record “plainly applies to the physical thing – there is nothing to suggest it applies to online distribution”.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Same old song at EMI?

Charles Allen seems a surprising replacement for Elio Leoni-Sceti but at least he wants to be there

Who is this exciting breakthrough act promising to “focus on creativity” and deliver a “digital platform” as chief executive of EMI Music? It can’t be. It is. It’s Charles Allen, whose past digital offerings included OnDigital (RIP) and Friends Reunited. Nor were many of his ITV shareholders overly impressed by the creative output in those days.

On the plus side, Allen is the man on the spot (he was already non-executive chairman of EMI Music) and he tends to stick around in a crisis, which is exactly where EMI finds itself.

Elio Leoni-Sceti, the departing chief executive, is leaving eight weeks before EMI Music presents a business plan to its parent, the private equity firm Terra Firma. The quality of this plan is meant to determine whether Guy Hands of Terra Firma will approach his investors for another £120m to prevent EMI breaching its banking covenants, an act that might cause the lender, Citigroup, to seize control.

It’s an odd moment, then, for Leoni-Sceti to declare that “my job here is now done”. He sings a very different tune in a lengthy interview in Management Today. “I’m staying focused on delivering a vision for this business – I’m very dedicated to EMI,” he tells the magazine. Before they hand over £120m, Terra Firma’s investors might care to press Hands for a full explanation.

Alternatively, they could reflect that a volunteer is worth two pressed men – Allen does sound terribly pleased to be a headline act again.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Charles Allen to run EMI’s music business

Former ITV boss to become executive chairman as troubled firm prepares last-ditch bid to raise £100m from investors

Former ITV boss Charles Allen is taking control of EMI’s music business, home to acts including Coldplay and Robbie Williams, after the surprise departure of chief executive Elio Leoni-Sceti.

Leoni-Sceti will be leaving the troubled company at the end of March after just 18 months with the firm. His departure comes at a critical time for EMI, as the cash-strapped business puts the finishing touches to a new business plan which its private equity owners can present to investors.

Allen, who joined EMI as a non-executive director in January 2009, will become executive chairman of the music company. EMI Music Publishing will continue to be run by chairman and chief executive Roger Faxon. Allen’s previous experience at ITV, which he created by merging Granada with Carlton Communications, is likely to increase speculation that EMI is being lined up for a merger with Warner Music.

EMI was bought by Terra Firma, run by City financier Guy Hands, for £4.2bn in 2007 but has run into severe problems, with key acts defecting and profits crashing. The company has suffered turbulent relations with some of its top acts, most recently ending up in court with Pink Floyd and plunged £1.75bn into the red last year. Crucially, unless Terra Firma can find more than £100m from investors to satisfy the terms of its loan from Citigroup, the bank which advised the private equity firm on the buyout and provided the lion’s share of the funding, EMI will end up in the hands of its banks.

Leoni-Sceti, a former executive with consumer products group Reckitt Benckiser, was asked to come up with a plan that would persuade investors to get involved. That business plan is due to be presented and new money raised by the end of June. But Leoni-Sceti said today: “My job here is now done and it is time for me to move on.”

Allen said he had been closely involved in the creation of the company’s new business plan. “Elio and I have worked together for the last 14 months and he has decided that he has done what he came to do,” he said.

He said that new business plan would be “very much an extension of things we have been doing”, adding: “If you look at what Terra Firma did, they came in and rationalised the cost base and we have continued to tighten the business. But more importantly what you have now got is a real focus on how do we drive new music, a focus on hits. These things do not happen overnight, you have to nurture new talent but the early signs are pretty positive.”

“The problem, the issue, is getting our message through. This is a good company with good people, we have got more to do but we are on track to deliver. We have a challenged cost structure.”

But the storm clouds keep gathering over the business. Terra Firma is currently locked in a bitter legal fight with Citigroup, claiming the bank tricked it into offering too much for EMI by failing to inform it that other potential buyers had pulled out. A US judge will rule by the end of the month whether the case will be heard in the US or UK.

Allen said: “Would it be better if that wasn’t there? Yes, but the team have got their heads down and just got on with it.”

Hands made headlines when he bought the business, as a result of his at times heavy-handed dealings with artists. Since then the new management at EMI has been building bridges. Asked whether he would be involved in dealing with EMI’s artists, Allen said he had already been meeting them. “I have spent a lot of time with the talent and the management,” he said. “It’s like ITV. Would you deal with Simon Cowell or Ant and Dec as chief executive? Yes you would. Here you would be dealing with Robbie Williams or Lily Allen or whoever.”

One of the key acts that Allen will have to charm is Coldplay. The band’s next album is rumoured to be the last under the existing deal with EMI, although last month the band’s frontman, Chris Martin, said the band was “signed for a lot”.

“I think there is a good relationship with Coldplay,” Allen added. “They are really talented and really focused and great to work with. The team they deal with on a day-to-day basis is the team that’s there delivering for them.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Charles Allen to run EMI’s music business

Former ITV boss to become executive chairman as troubled firm prepares last-ditch bid to raise £100m from investors

Former ITV boss Charles Allen is taking control of EMI’s music business, home to acts including Coldplay and Robbie Williams, after the surprise departure of chief executive Elio Leoni-Sceti.

Leoni-Sceti will be leaving the troubled company at the end of March after just 18 months with the firm. His departure comes at a critical time for EMI, as the cash-strapped business puts the finishing touches to a new business plan which its private equity owners can present to investors.

Allen, who joined EMI as a non-executive director in January 2009, will become executive chairman of the music company. EMI Music Publishing will continue to be run by chairman and chief executive Roger Faxon. Allen’s previous experience at ITV, which he created by merging Granada with Carlton Communications, is likely to increase speculation that EMI is being lined up for a merger with Warner Music.

EMI was bought by Terra Firma, run by City financier Guy Hands, for £4.2bn in 2007 but has run into severe problems, with key acts defecting and profits crashing. The company has suffered turbulent relations with some of its top acts, most recently ending up in court with Pink Floyd and plunged £1.75bn into the red last year. Crucially, unless Terra Firma can find more than £100m from investors to satisfy the terms of its loan from Citigroup, the bank which advised the private equity firm on the buyout and provided the lion’s share of the funding, EMI will end up in the hands of its banks.

Leoni-Sceti, a former executive with consumer products group Reckitt Benckiser, was asked to come up with a plan that would persuade investors to get involved. That business plan is due to be presented and new money raised by the end of June. But Leoni-Sceti said today: “My job here is now done and it is time for me to move on.”

Allen said he had been closely involved in the creation of the company’s new business plan. “Elio and I have worked together for the last 14 months and he has decided that he has done what he came to do,” he said.

He said that new business plan would be “very much an extension of things we have been doing”, adding: “If you look at what Terra Firma did, they came in and rationalised the cost base and we have continued to tighten the business. But more importantly what you have now got is a real focus on how do we drive new music, a focus on hits. These things do not happen overnight, you have to nurture new talent but the early signs are pretty positive.”

“The problem, the issue, is getting our message through. This is a good company with good people, we have got more to do but we are on track to deliver. We have a challenged cost structure.”

But the storm clouds keep gathering over the business. Terra Firma is currently locked in a bitter legal fight with Citigroup, claiming the bank tricked it into offering too much for EMI by failing to inform it that other potential buyers had pulled out. A US judge will rule by the end of the month whether the case will be heard in the US or UK.

Allen said: “Would it be better if that wasn’t there? Yes, but the team have got their heads down and just got on with it.”

Hands made headlines when he bought the business, as a result of his at times heavy-handed dealings with artists. Since then the new management at EMI has been building bridges. Asked whether he would be involved in dealing with EMI’s artists, Allen said he had already been meeting them. “I have spent a lot of time with the talent and the management,” he said. “It’s like ITV. Would you deal with Simon Cowell or Ant and Dec as chief executive? Yes you would. Here you would be dealing with Robbie Williams or Lily Allen or whoever.”

One of the key acts that Allen will have to charm is Coldplay. The band’s next album is rumoured to be the last under the existing deal with EMI, although last month the band’s frontman, Chris Martin, said the band was “signed for a lot”.

“I think there is a good relationship with Coldplay,” Allen added. “They are really talented and really focused and great to work with. The team they deal with on a day-to-day basis is the team that’s there delivering for them.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Abbey Road not for sale, says EMI

Record company ends week of speculation about future of iconic studios made famous by the Beatles

Fears that the iconic Abbey Road recording studios were to be sold were allayed today when its owners EMI said it had no intention of selling the building.

After frenzied speculation in which the National Trust was called upon to save the studios made famous by the Beatles, the struggling music group released a statement saying it believed it should retain ownership.

The company said it had rejected a bid for the historic building last year but was in discussions about a “revitalisation” project to bring new life to the studios.

EMI, which was taken over by Guy Hands’s private equity firm Terra Firma in 2007, welcomed reports that English Heritage was accelerating plans to list the site at 3 Abbey Road in St John’s Wood, north-west London, and said it had been holding discussions over the regeneration plans since November.

“At all times, these plans have focused on providing access to artists and, where possible, members of the public,” the company said today.

“In mid-2009, we did receive an offer to buy Abbey Road for in excess of £30m but this was rejected since we believe that Abbey Road should remain in EMI’s ownership.”

Amid the speculative gossip surrounding the prospective sale there was no shortage of potential buyers, with music impresario Andrew Lloyd Webber saying he was “very interested” in buying the studios.

Other stars were quick to join the debate, with DJ Chris Evans calling on the National Trust to save the studios while Sir Paul McCartney revealed a possible bid was in the pipeline.

An outpouring of public concern lead to a tidal wave of messages on the social networking sites Twitter and Facebook, with a petition on the latter getting thousands of signatures.

But today EMI, which was thought to want to sell the site to reduce the debt from a leveraged buyout three years ago, dismissed reports of a sale, saying that while it was looking for an investor in the site, it was not looking for a buyer.

“In response to recent press speculation, EMI confirms that it is holding preliminary discussions for the revitalisation of Abbey Road with interested and appropriate third parties,” the company said today.

“When Terra Firma acquired EMI in 2007, it made the preservation of Abbey Road a priority. Abbey Road studios had, for a number of years, been losing money and we have developed plans to revitalise the studios. These plans would involve a substantial injection of new capital.”

The building, originally a Georgian town house, has attracted millions fans from across the world after being catapulted to fame thanks to the Beatles’ 1969 album Abbey Road. The company repaints the fence outside the studios every month to cover the latest graffiti, while fans take pictures of each other on the famous crossing, unaware that the original has moved since its moment of fame on the album’s cover.

EMI bought the property, used by the Beatles for 90% of their recordings, for £100,000 in 1929, transforming it into world famous studios that have hosted artists as diverse as composer Sir Edward Elgar, Pink Floyd and Blur.

EMI, home to artists such as Robbie Williams and Coldplay, earlier this month posted a £1.75bn loss for the year to March 2009. Terra Firma, which took on huge debts in 2007 to buy the firm and is almost certain to breach lending terms without further investment, has also reportedly sought investors to pump £120m into the business.

EMI’s chief executive, Elio Leoni-Sceti, is believed to be drawing up plans to cut millions from the company’s costs and grow the group’s digital operations.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Andrew Lloyd Webber may buy Abbey Road studios

Composer says it is ‘vital’ to save recording venue made famous by the Beatles amid concern EMI may sell them

Andrew Lloyd Webber says he is “very interested” in buying Abbey Road studios, saying it is “vital for the future of the music industry in the UK” to save the north London venue where he and the Beatles laid down much of their work.

A spokesman for the composer and impressario said he first recorded there in 1967 with Tim Rice. “Abbey Road has such great facilities, with three major recording studios, and Andrew has probably brought more musicians to record there than anyone else, because it has the capacity to record large orchestral productions.”

Lloyd Webber threw his hat into the ring to save the studios, which gave their name to a Beatles album, as concern grew over cash-strapped EMI’s plan to sell them.

Sir Paul McCartney has raised hopes that someone will buy them (although hasn’t promised to try himself) and the National Trust, already the owner of the childhood homes of McCartney and John Lennon, has expressed cautious interest after DJ Chris Evans suggested it should step in.

The government has promised to fast-track a long-standing recommendation from English Heritage that the 19th century building should be officially listed.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Threatened Abbey Road studios could get listed status

Government will make quick decision on English Heritage recommendation as EMI plans sale

An application to list the famous Abbey Road studios, a pop music shrine since 1969 when it gave its name to the Beatles album, will be fast-tracked by the government after gathering dust since 2003, when English Heritage first advised that it should become a listed building.

The north London building, originally a 19th-century villa, has been a recording studio since 1931 and is now under threat because of reported plans by the cash-strapped EMI record company to sell it. As things stand a new owner could flatten it overnight.

“Abbey Road is among hundreds of buildings for which listing applications are under consideration, but there has been no urgency until now about reaching a decision,” a spokesman at the Department of Culture, Media and Sport said. “It has now become urgent and so will be given urgent attention.”

The culture minister, Margaret Hodge, is due back from holiday next week, and the application will be top of her in-tray.

English Heritage urged ministers to get on with it.

“We applaud the public enthusiasm and support for safeguarding the future of the Abbey Road Studios and call on ministers to turn their attention to the advice that we provided in 2003 and endorse our recommendation to list the building at grade ll,” it said in a statement.

“English Heritage believes that the Abbey Road Studios possess outstanding cultural interest as the world’s earliest purpose-built, and still the most famous, recording studios. Its importance as the leading force in popular music is perhaps greater today than ever and is revered internationally.”

The National Trust, which already owns the childhood homes in Liverpool of John Lennon and Sir Paul McCartney – who has supported the campaign to save the building – has already expressed cautious interest in taking on the studios, a move which English Heritage welcomed.

The much-altered building is no beauty, but because of its place in pop history an application to list it was made as far back as 1994. English Heritage, the government’s official heritage adviser, then recommended against it.

However, by 2003, with flocks of tourists still turning up from all over the world to gaze reverently at the facade and then risk being flattened by a lorry to recreate the album cover by photographing themselves on the nearby pedestrian crossing, English Heritage changed its mind and advised that the building did merit listing. Such listing would not guarantee the building’s survival, but would force any new owner and the planning authority to give it special consideration.

Abbey Road already had a distinguished place in music history before the Beatles clapped eyes on it.

Sir Edward Elgar conducted the London Symphony Orchestra there, blasting out Land of Hope and Glory, and a near neighbour, Sir Malcolm Sargent, regularly used the studios. Cliff Richard recorded his 1958 hit Move It at Abbey Road, and in recent years the Manic Street Preachers, Travis and Blur have also worked there.

However, it is suffering from the trend towards microstudios and away from large centralised facilities which are expensive to maintain.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds