Financial and business news and articles
Posts tagged Family finances
Scottish Power trumps EDF with gas prices cut
Mar 11th
Scottish Power has said it will reduce its gas prices by 8%, double the cut announced hours earlier by EDF
Scottish Power has become the latest company to reduce the price of its gas, doubling the cut made by rival EDF Energy just hours earlier.
The company’s 1.6 million gas customers will see the size of their gas bills fall by 8% – a typical £66 a year – from 31 March. EDF Energy also announced it would cut its prices, but the 4% reduction has been described as a “token gesture” by one expert.
EDF’s cut, which amounts to about £30 a year off a typical gas bill, will take effect from 26 March. It follows recent cuts from British Gas, E.ON, Scottish & Southern and npower of between 6% and 7%.
Mark Todd, director of price comparison website energyhelpline.com, said: “Although any cut is welcome, this is a token gesture by EDF and hardly worth the wait.”
Gareth Kloet, head of utilities at Confused.com, branded all the recent energy cuts a “disappointment” and “too little too late.”
“Energy suppliers are acting like a pack by all cutting by around the same amount, despite the fact that energy regulator Ofgem recently concluded they are making profits amounting to around £105 a year per energy customer,” he said.
“The fact that most of these companies, with the exception of British Gas, are delaying the reductions until the end of March is also poor. When they put prices up they do it with immediate effect.”
He added that some customers could now save up to £400 a year by switching to an online tariff and paying by direct debit, rather than paying by cash and cheque and staying on a company’s standard tariff. This is because the gap between the cheapest online tariff and the cheapest standard tariff has widened significantly over the past few months.
Scottish Power said today that customers could make further savings of up to £382 by paying by direct debit and managing their account online.
Estimation warning
Meanwhile, two out of five householders are overpaying for their gas and electricity and failing to ask for a refund, according to latest research by Gocompare.com.
Those that are overpaying are owed, on average, £124.34 by their energy supplier, while one in 10 is due as much as £500, it said.
Mark Greening, head of utilities at Gocompare.com, said: “You should never let your utility company estimate your energy usage – it is a sure-fire way to end up shelling out more than you really need to.
“It is not unusual to build up a credit during the summer, and following the bitterly cold winter we have experienced, any overpayments made could have helped soften the blow of the big bills that most of us have recently received.”
He continued: “However, if you find yourself in credit after your winter bills have been paid then make sure you ask for your money back – it is better to have the extra cash in your bank account than in your energy provider’s.”
Is it worth spending money on expensive cookware?
Mar 5th
A reader wonders if it paying more for pans means they will last longer
Every week a Guardian Money reader submits a question, and it’s up to you to help him or her out – a selection of the best answers will appear in Saturday’s paper.
This week’s question
Our big family goes through a cheap non-stick frying pan every year, and each time I buy another I wonder if it’s worth spending £80 on a decent one. If I do will it really last the 20 years they claim? I am told cast iron is better, as non-stick is bad for you, but do they work?
What are your thoughts?
Is it worth spending money on expensive cookware?
Mar 5th
A reader wonders if it paying more for pans means they will last longer
Every week a Guardian Money reader submits a question, and it’s up to you to help him or her out – a selection of the best answers will appear in Saturday’s paper.
This week’s question
Our big family goes through a cheap non-stick frying pan every year, and each time I buy another I wonder if it’s worth spending £80 on a decent one. If I do will it really last the 20 years they claim? I am told cast iron is better, as non-stick is bad for you, but do they work?
What are your thoughts?
Cashpoints: House prices fall in February
Mar 4th
• This week’s top news stories
• Virginia Wallis answers your homebuying questions
• How to improve your chances of getting a mortgage
This week’s top stories
• House prices fell by 1.5% in February, figures from one of the UK’s largest lenders showed today, in a further sign of a slowdown in the housing market.
• Grandparents in some of the UK’s most vulnerable families are risking hardship by taking time out of work to provide free childcare, a report claimed today.
• Think you’ve been given the chance to sign up as an iPad tester via Facebook? No you haven’t – it’s a scam which actually signs you up to a premium rate mobile service, warns the security company Sophos.
• Do you have any feedback on any of these issues that you want to get off your chest? Email us at money.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
Feature
Ten of the best … ways to improve your chances of getting a mortgage
The easy availability of mortgages was a key factor behind the credit crunch, and once the global banking system started to implode it was one of the first things to give. Lenders cracked down on loan-to-values and tightened up criteria, making it hard for all but the most angelic homebuyers and remortgagors to get a loan.
Things are improving, but lenders have warned that they expect to offer fewer mortgages this year than before the financial crisis. So how do you increase your chances of being one of the approved few? Read the article in full here
Ask the experts: Homebuying
Question of the week: “My husband and I are divorcing. How to do we alter the deeds of our houses to reflect as much?”
Our homebuying expert Virginia Wallis says: “What matters when changing the deeds is when you bought the houses. If a property was bought after 1 December 1990 it is almost certain to be registered at the Land Registry, since that was when land registration became compulsory for the whole of England and Wales …” Read the answer in full here
• Any questions? Email our panel of experts on financial concerns, consumer gripes, legal wrangles, debt worries and career-related problems at money.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
Tools
Free Isa brochures
Don’t lose your tax-free savings allowance. The limit is currently £7,200 for the under-50s, or £10,200 if you are 50 or above (it rises to £10,200 for everyone from 6 April). This allowance must be used by 5 April or you will lose it. Browse these brochures to find the Isa that best suits you
Grandparents suffer to take on childcare
Mar 2nd
Poorer women who give up work to look after grandchildren are losing pay, report finds
Grandparents in some of the UK’s most vulnerable families are risking hardship by taking time out of work to provide free childcare, a report claimed today.
Research commissioned by the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the charity Grandparents Plus found that working-class grandmothers of working age on low incomes were more likely to have given up work or reduced their hours to care for grandchildren than those in wealthier families.
Working-class women were more likely to be young grandmothers, defined as under 50-years-old, than middle-class women, while their younger relatives were less likely to be able to afford formal childcare arrangements.
Giving up their own jobs to plug the childcare gap had a big impact on grandmothers’ income – nearly two-thirds of grandmothers who had given up work or reduced their hours to care for their grandchildren were managing on a very low household income.
The report showed that while across demographic groups, one in three families rely on grandparents to provide some kind of childcare on a weekly basis, among single-parent families that figure rises to between half and two-thirds. Children of these families are nearly twice as likely to experience economic hardship than the wider population.
It said more than half of families with a disabled child live in poverty or are in danger of sinking into it, and that grandparents in these families play a considerable role in providing emotional, practical and financial support, particularly during times of crisis.
It also found that ethnic minority households are most likely to have a grandparent, child and grandchild all living under the same roof, which it said often led to the expectation that grandparents would take on high levels of childcare.
The report, Protect, Support, Provide, was based on new data from the British Social Attitudes survey, together with a review of literature on the role of grandparents role in society.
The researchers said historically the contribution grandparents made to their grandchildren’s lives had been “underestimated and under-recorded”, but it was known that it varied widely from occasional childcare support through to substantial periods of regular childcare to enable parents to return to work.
They added: “The cosy (stereotypical) image of the benevolent, middle-class grandparent with the resources and time to ’spoil’ their grandchildren is familiar for some but it does not reflect the reality for many.”
The groups behind the report said the government’s aims of increasing the numbers of lone parents in work and increasing the employment rate of older people as they approach retirement were working in conflict with each other.
Kay Carberry, commissioner at the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said: “The contribution of grandparents cannot be ignored. Without the free childcare they give, many parents would not be able to work. This is particularly important in low income families that may find it difficult to pay for childcare.”
Sam Smethers, chief executive of Grandparents Plus, said: “Until very recently we’ve seen a failure to consider the importance of grandparents in family life. This has made them invisible to government, so it’s not surprising that targets on child poverty and older people’s poverty are working against each other.
“It’s time the government recognised that grandparents provide the last line of defence between millions of children and that poverty line. They need recognition and better emotional, financial and practical support.”
To make life easier for grandparents, the groups are calling on the government to extend the right to request flexible working to all employees and to abolish the default retirement age.
They also want to work with Jobcentre Plus advisers to accommodate the needs of the wider family and ensure the forthcoming Child Poverty Commission considers the role of grandparents in their work.
Should I let my husband indulge his mid-life crisis?
Feb 26th
A reader wonders what to do about her fortysomething husband’s desire to buy a motorbike
Every week a Guardian Money reader submits a question, and it’s up to you to help him or her out – a selection of the best answers will appear in Saturday’s paper.
This week’s question
My 45-year-old husband appears to be going though a mid-life crisis and is talking about getting a motorbike or a sports car. We can’t afford either, but I’m more concerned he’ll kill himself. Should I try to nip this in the bud, or is he beyond help? Someone suggested buying him a canoe – what have other desperate housewives done?
What are your thoughts?
Cashpoints: Tax breaks for wealthy pension savers ’should end’
Feb 25th
· Tax breaks for wealthy pension savers ’should end’
· Virginia Wallis answers your homebuying questions
· £200,000 to raise a child? Try these money-saving tips
This week’s top stories
Tax breaks for wealthy pension savers ’should end’
Generous tax breaks for wealthy pension savers should be slashed in the next budget to save the exchequer millions of pounds and simplify complex rules on retirement saving due next year, says an industry lobby group. More on pensions
Santander 3.5% cash Isa leads the market
Santander fired the first shot in this year’s Isa war today by launching a market-leading cash account with a guaranteed interest rate of 3.5% for a year. More on Isas
Mortgage approvals fall sharply in January, says BBA
The number of mortgages approved by British banks for house purchases dropped sharply in January, figures showed today, following a rush to buy properties before the stamp duty threshold increased at the end of last year. More on property
· Do you have any feedback on any of these issues that you want to get off your chest? Email us at money.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
Feature
£200,000 to raise a child? Try these money-saving tips
The cost of raising a child has now topped £200,000, and according to friendly society LV=, and in the first year alone an average little one will set his or her parents back £9,152.
It is easy to see how costs can mount up. Baby clothes are temptingly cute, and splash out on a top-of-the-range buggy and you will be shelling out more than many pay for a car. But spending huge amounts of money on your first baby is avoidable, and spending the best part of £10,000 is certainly unnecessary…
Read the article in full here
Ask the experts
Question of the week:
“I’m 70 years old and want a mortgage for no more than 10 years, where should I go?”
Our homebuying expert Virginia Wallis says:
“You could try the Ecology building society, Halifax or the Nationwide…”
Read the answer in full here
· Any questions? Email our panel of experts on financial concerns, consumer gripes, legal wrangles, debt worries and career-related problems at money.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk
Tools
Best selling broadband deals
Search thousands of deals to find the best package in your area with our digital comparison service.
Should I use lump sum to pay off mortgage or save for children’s studies?
Feb 25th
Q I am in my 50s, semi-retired, with £70,000 outstanding on my repayment mortgage which will be paid off by 2017 at the latest (I am currently overpaying). I also have two children of 15 and 13 who will be hoping to go to university.
I am in the fortunate position of being about to inherit £60k later this year and wondered if I should repay my mortgage with the lump sum and use what would have been mortgage repayment money to save for university fees or would it be better to simply invest £30k each for the children now in a trust fund for their education? Or maybe half and half? If I did pay off the mortgage, what kind of product should I invest in? All the ISAs I currently have for them have nearly halved in value and I am reluctant to use them.
My husband and I will be earning (hopefully) for the next four years at least to pay the mortgage off but after that we will go onto pensions which, while relatively generous (half salary), will not allow us to subsidise our children’s university education at that time. We need to save now. AT
A Because you are likely to be paying a higher rate of interest on your mortgage than on your savings, I would be tempted to use the £60,000 to help clear the loan and start building up a fund for your children.
Given the time scale involved, it is probably best to stick to low-risk investments where the value of the money you save will not fluctuate. So that means some form of cash savings. If you can commit to regular saving – which you should be able to do – you can earn pretty good rates of interest with the regular savings accounts from Nottingham, Principality, Stroud & Swindon and Buckinghamshire building societies. They pay 5%, 4.5%, 4.5% and 4.12% respectively. Alternatively, you could save in a cash ISA and/or the range of cash savings from National Savings & Investments.
It is also worth bearing in mind that when your children to go to university, paying their fees up front for them may not be the best thing to do. The fact that students can get heavily subsidised loans to pay their fees can mean that it is better to take the cheap loan to pay for fees. In addition, if you and your husband will be living on a much-reduced income by that children, the means test of parental income may mean that they qualify for a non-repayable grant. You can find out more in the student finance section of www.direct.gov.uk.
This benefit cut will hit the poorest | Leslie Morphy
Mar 4th
Posted by Leslie Morphy in Finance
No comments
Housing benefit needs to be reformed, but cuts to local housing allowance will lead to more poverty, debt and homelessness
Monday’s news that councils face a 15% budget cut comes as no surprise. With a huge deficit, cuts in the near future are inevitable – whoever forms the next government. There are tough choices on the horizon – but the axe must not fall on the poorest.
Among the most vulnerable are people who rely on local housing allowance, a type of housing benefit for people living in the private sector, to pay the rent. Protecting these people from cuts is not just the right moral choice – it makes financial sense for us all.
We’ve just come to the end of a consultation period into housing benefit, of which Crisis was a part. The Department for Work and Pensions has published its findings and recommendations. Reading between the lines, it is clear that the government means to cut the £17bn annual rental bill. If you read the majority of newspaper headlines about benefit recipients, cuts to housing benefit make perfect sense. We are bombarded with stories of people choosing benefits as a “lifestyle choice” or of the very exceptional cases of families living in mansions in Mayfair on £1,000 a week.
Research that Crisis released on Monday tells a very different story. The vast majority of people on housing benefit are trapped in a cycle of unemployment and poverty, and are struggling to make ends meet.
Housing benefit is in desperate need of reform, but the changes proposed to the way the level of local housing allowance (LHA) is calculated would reduce benefit levels for everyone, which could be a disaster for already stretched recipients.
In a survey of housing advisers we conducted, 92% said that their clients already fall behind with their rent if faced with a shortfall, 55% said that claimants were getting into credit card and loan debt when their housing benefit was not covering the rent and a quarter of Crisis’s own clients said that such debt had directly contributed to them becoming homeless.
Most worryingly, 86% of housing advisers said that just a £5 cut in LHA would make paying the rent more difficult – 51% said it would make it far more difficult or impossible. Increased poverty, debt and even homelessness could overshadow any savings to be made through these cuts, as the cost to the state of a single person becoming homeless can be as high as £24,500 a year.
Moving people into work should be the best means of escaping poverty and homelessness and reducing the £17bn housing benefit bill. Yet 94% of housing advisers said claimants were worried about what would happen to their housing benefit if they do get a job – and rightly so. With rents so high and an excessive throttling of benefits when people move back into work – often low-paid employment with fluctuating hours – falling into rent arrears is a real and frightening possibility.
The government must ease the transition into employment and we welcome the proposals in the consultation to pay a new transition-into-work payment and to fix awards over a period for those facing fluctuating incomes. These changes need to come in as soon as possible with the maximum flexibility for claimants. We must also end the absurd situation of benefits recipients losing up to 85p in every £1 they earn when they move into work.
We need real and radical reform for people trapped in the housing benefit system. Not benefit reductions that could mean disaster for those already struggling to make ends meet.